Do you know what would have happened if Russia’s Rosatom, the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant’s subsidiary, had not suddenly announced on July 29 that it had terminated the contract with the Turkish partner IC İçtaş for the construction of the plant? President Tayyip Erdoğan would return from Sochi, where he will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin on August 5, with the good news that Russia has decided to purchase 10-15 billion dollars worth of Turkish Treasury bonds.
The gospel would probably also include that the US-controlled SWAP system is not applicable since Türkiye-Russia trade would now be carried out in Lira and Ruble. Putin did not allow this. He officially usurped one of Erdogan’s trump cards and started the Sochi meeting 1-0 ahead.
More importantly, Putin announced to the Turkish public that Rosatom, the Russian state atomic energy company founded in 2007, is 100 percent owner and operator of Akkuyu. While the Treasury was in trouble, Erdogan had to put up with Putin’s fait accompli.
The Akkuyu Power Plant, the ongoing project of four reactors at the site on the Mediterranean has been branded as Türkiye’s first nuclear power plant by Erdoğan and the AKP, but in fact, it is more correct to say it is the first nuclear power plant in Türkiye. Even after the establishment agreement in 2010, Rosatom announced that they would build the first nuclear power plant outside of Russia in Türkiye, in Akkuyu, on the Mediterranean coast of Mersin’s Gülnar district.
Moscow’s Akkuyu operation
Moscow started with a psychological operation. First, the Turkish press was informed that 20 billion dollars would come from Russia. The first 5 billion was due this week. This money would be used for the expenses incurred by the Akkuyu power plant, and the next 15 billion within three weeks would be kept in Türkiye for 2 years. Where? In the vaults of Russia’s state-owned atomic energy company Rosatom.
Before this news could even have an expected positive effect on the markets, another news broke that Rosatom terminated its agreement with Turkish firm IC İçtaş on the same day. The next day, Rosatom announced that it had signed a contract with TSM Enerji, İnşaat, Sanayi AŞ for the construction of the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant.
At first glance, it looked like an agreement was signed with another Turkish company. However, according to the documents published by journalist Toygun Atilla on OdaTV, the TSM was composed of three Russian companies: Montajno-Stroitelnoye Upravneliye and Sosnovoborel, the Russian contractor of electro assembly and construction, Titan-2. The headquarters of the construction company is in Moscow.
İçtaş says it will apply to international courts. While the government seems to have put up with this fait accompli for now, it doesn’t look like they will. However, it can be said that Putin removed one of the most important possible issues on the agenda of meeting with Erdoğan before Erdoğan’s arrival, and without Erdoğan’s response.
Partnership in construction is also over
Akkuyu is the first power plant in the world to be established with the “build-own-operate” system. There is no “transfer” part of the “build-operate-transfer” system. According to the agreement, it will not be handed over to the Turkish state after a while, it will always be Rosatom’s, which is as you know Russia’s state-owned atomic energy company.
In the beginning, the construction of the power plant was undertaken by a consortium of Atomstroyexport, another Russian state company, and Cengiz-Kalyon-Kolin partnership. Founded in 2018 with a 25 percent partnership with Rosatom, JSC Titan-2 company took over the Russian partnership of Akkuyu construction in 2019. In the same year, the Cengiz-Kalyon-Kolin contract was terminated because they did not fulfil their obligations and the Turkish construction partner became IC İçtaş with a 50 percent share.
Another noteworthy aspect of the issue is that the contract was terminated 8 days after the 4th unit groundbreaking ceremony on July 21 where the project was praised stating the construction progressed according to the schedule. This shows that the decision was more political than economic. Journalist Çiğdem Toker had already written that the government allocated a budget for its promotion because it knew that the project was political. Recent developments prove this.
İçtaş says they will apply to international courts. Let’s also note that the IC will no longer be responsible for parts that Russian companies have to import from the West due to the US embargo. But in the end, there is no Turkish participation in the Akkuyu project at the moment.
High prices
Let me remind you that President Erdoğan, who signed the “build-operate-not transfer” agreement with Russia when he was the Prime Minister and got it approved in the Parliament with the AKP votes, once criticized former Prime Minister Mesut Yılmaz for signing Blue Stream natural gas pipeline project with Russia with the condition of “take or pay”.
Türkiye guarantees to receive 70 percent of the electricity to be produced from the first two of the four turbines of 1200 megawatts each (the first of which should be commissioned in 2023) and 30 percent of the electricity to be produced from the other two for 15 years, through TEDAŞ.
Do you know the price? At an unprecedented price in the world: 12.35 cents/US dollar per kilowatt hour, that makes 221 kuruş(cent) in Turkish Liras at an exchange rate of 17,92 USD/TRY.
A heavy burden to the people and the state
Well, do you know how many liras the state sells electricity to the distribution companies that set the electricity prices, which caused the public’s rightful reaction? The average to the Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA) is 125 cents. Moreover, the price of Akkuyu electricity will automatically increase as the Turkish lira depreciates against the US dollar.
Japan withdrew from the construction of the Sinop Nuclear Power Plant, as the electricity price was no longer feasible in the face of rising costs. But Russia, which has a reach to the Mediterranean thanks to the Akkuyu NPP, has no intention of withdrawing from this lucrative agreement, on the contrary, it is showing its strength in the middle of the Ukraine war, over the signatures signed in 2010, before a critical meeting.